TURL | Table Understanding through Representation Learning | Dataset library

So... I took the error I was getting literally, and followed the idea that the view component could not be found (Even though component.invoke() works perfectly).

I stumbled across this: ASP.NET Core MVC View Component search path

The link says the runtime searches for the view in the following paths:

• "/Views/{Controller Name}/Components/{View Component Name}/{View Name}"

• "/Views/Shared/Components/{View Component Name}/{View Name}"

• "/Pages/Shared/Components/{View Component Name}/{View Name}"

In our project we don't have the view components in any of those locations. Our path is "/Pages/Components/{View Component Name}/{View Name}"

This made me question why the invoke function finds the view components at all!

Following the answer provided in that question I added the following to the startup.cs:

You can simply use the path.Dir function:

So i found the issue. StringList from the TDomTree was referenced in thread that updated the ui. So therefore, when worker thread tried to destroy the searchResultTable, its TDomTree's StringList could not be terminated, creating exception, so whole TDomTree was not terminating.

To read request multiple time you will need to cache your request before it is read the 1st time. More info can be read here.

Spring MVC provides the ContentCachingRequestWrapper class. It is a wrapper around the original HttpServletRequest object.

To use it, we must first create a web filter which wraps the original HttpServletRequest:

It appears that Google Apps Script can't handle a response from var myFile = Drive.Files.get(fileID,{alt: 'media'}); and if not already you might want to file as a bug.

Edit: updated related issue ticket here.

Instead of using the Drive Advanced Service you might find it easier to use DriveApp. Depending on the rest of your code no additional scopes would be required when mixing Drive and DriveApp calls.

For example you could use:

Exception has Exception Code = 1 (second line in your exception):

The TGT is a ticket issued to the krbtgt service. That's all it is. You can get tickets through either the AS or TGS flow.

In order to get a ticket from the AS flow you need to have what Kerberos calls long term credentials to initiate or complete the flow. The AS-REP contains a value encrypted to that long term credential, so it's only useful if you have the password (or certificate, or whatever).

In order to get a ticket from the TGS flow you need to have a ticket issued for krbtgt.

The common practice is to use the AS flow to request a ticket to krbtgt using your password as the long term credential (or certificate, or whatever). There's nothing stopping you from requesting a different service in the AS-REQ, it just happens that no one does it because it defeats the purpose of using a TGT in place of the creds. There are specific services this is special-cased for like password change though where this is the only way you can get a ticket (say your password is expired, you can't get a TGT, but can get a changepw ticket).

Once you have the TGT, you can request tickets to any other service using a TGS-REQ, including requesting another TGT by setting the service to krbtgt (it's effectively treated as a renew). The TGS-REP is returned to the client and contains the service ticket encrypted against the krbtgt session key. The client can decrypt it because it has the session key. Once it's decrypted the client converts it to an AP-REQ and hands it off to whatever application requested a ticket. The ticket in the AP-REQ is encrypted to the service password.

You get this notice because key category is array. PHP tries to convert this array to string so as to apply preg_grep, that's why you receive this warning. I suppose you can do something like:

The callback of onMessage should return true in order to keep the internal messaging channel open so that sendResponse can work asynchronously.

The problem is, your callback is declared with async keyword which means it returns a Promise so it can't return a literal true value because Chrome extensions API doesn't support Promise and hence can't resolve it.

Use a standard function callback and a nested async IIFE: